You open the container and four pallet corners are crushed, one-third of the SKUs have water stains, and half a pallet of boxed product is missing entirely. The supplier says "not our problem after the container was sealed." The forwarder says "sign the POD first." The insurer says "show us evidence." And you have about five working days to document everything before every one of those doors starts closing with quiet procedural delays. This page is the routine for that week, written for orders in the $3k-50k band where law-firm escalation is uneconomic but losing 30% of an order is painful.
The Claim Clock: Five Deadlines Stacked on One Shipment
The reason claims die is never one missed deadline; it's buyers treating several deadlines as one. They stack:
| Clock | Typical window | What triggers forfeiture |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence | 5 working days | Not photos themselves — credible quantified counts. A claim that arrives week 3 with vague totals reads as negotiable fiction |
| Carrier notice | Days (written at delivery) | Noting damage on the POD/exception report at handover; unilateral "clean" POD signatures are the classic self-inflicted wound |
| Forwarder notice | ~14 days | Most forwarder T&C versions adopt 14 days for concealed damage |
| Insurer notice | 30-45 days | Policy-specific; late notice with prejudice = denied even if the loss was real |
| Suit deadline (carrier) | 1 year (Hague-Visby) | No filed suit within 12 months = carrier liability extinguished regardless of merit |
Operate the week-one rule: photograph, quantify and send every notice within the first five working days even if numbers are still moving. An amended, quantified claim beats a late perfect one.
Who Owes You What: The Liability Map by Incoterm
Liability follows the risk transfer, then fault, then the policy instrument. On an FOB order the risk line sits at the ship's rail — which means the carrier and your own cargo insurance carry transit loss, while supplier fault (bad packing to spec) survives the rail as a quality claim:
- Supplier (PI claim). Packing per ordered spec not honored, inadequate dunnage for a fragile SKU the supplier said was routine, goods wet before loading. This claim is governed by the PI defect clause — the 14-30 day window from the scam-defense checklist, not the carrier's clock.
- Carrier (package liability). Visible loss/damage in transit, clean B/L, damage reported properly: recovery is limited (roughly $20/kg or 2 SDR/kg; containerized goods often capped "per package" in ways that make recovery small against invoice value) and requires proof of custody-segment damage.
- Marine cargo insurance. The intended payer for transit loss at invoice value, minus deductibles/salvage credit. An all-risks policy covers crushing, water, and pilferage pair patterns; exclusions usually include insufficient packing — which loops the claim back to the supplier as a packing nonconformity.
- Forwarder. Liable mainly for its own handling negligence and for acting on bad instructions; its "liability package" (if purchased) raises the recovery ceiling materially compared to bare forwarder terms.
Direction of attack: the insurance route pays most, fastest. The supplier route (packing fault) pays fully, at invoice-plus logic. The carrier route is the fallback to document even when you expect little, because the one-year suit clock must be preserved by notice.
The Evidence Routine: Photos That Decide Claims
Claims are decided by correlation — your photos must connect packaging state to goods state to quantity, and to the document set:
- Exterior first, before opening anything: door seals, tear lines, collapse patterns, water staining direction, forklift punctures. If the container was sealed and the seal intact, note the seal number visibly.
- Carton-level: each damaged carton photographed from four angles plus a label shot linking it to the packing-list line. Count later; document now.
- Content-level: one "establishing" photo per damaged SKU (carton + contents + packing list page together in frame), then detail shots of the damage type — crush, water tide-lines, scuffs, tears.
- Keep the physical evidence: damaged goods and packaging quarantined, not dumped. The surveyor, the insurer's adjuster and (if it goes there) the supplier dispute each ask for something you already have.
- The paper pairing: commercial invoice, packing list, B/L, arrival notice, POD with exceptions noted. The claim's credibility is the match between these five and the photo pack.
What to write down the same day: seal numbers and container number, delivery driver's name, warehouse receipt vs packing-list discrepancies, drum count of damaged units per SKU. Numbers age badly in memory.
Packaging Forensics: Finding the Actual Culprit
Before pointing fingers, run the three diagnostic patterns — the pattern selects the defendant:
| Pattern | Signature | Points at |
|---|---|---|
| Transit crush | Deformation direction consistent top-down across tiers; pallet wrap intact; you load-bearing cartons failed under stacking | Packing spec (carton ECT grade shorted) or load plan — supplier first, carrier second |
| Water ingress | Tide-lines on one face; stain follows gravity; neighboring cartons unaffected | Container door gasket or a hole — carrier custody issue (if seal intact at origin, note the contrast) |
| Pilferage pattern | Clean cartons, contents short; seals re-taped or seal mismatch | Theft in custody — police report at destination is part of the insurer file |
The cheap instrument: an independent survey report ($300-800) for claims above roughly $5,000. Insurers treat survey reports as near-decisive; suppliers cannot argue against them casually. Commission before moving, repairing or discarding anything — the surveyor's first question is always "where is it as it arrived."
The Settlement Math: LCL, FCL and What Actually Pays
Worked example, real shape: 4,000 units, invoice $18,000, landed freight $2,400. Damage: 640 units (16%), 480 sellable-after-repack, 160 unsellable; pilferage of 1 carton (40 units, $180). Claim shape:
- Cargo insurance route (all-risks, 0.4% = $72 premium): recoverable ≈ unsellable invoice value ($720) + pilferage ($180) + survey credit admin — minus deductible (~$250) — minus salvage credit for repack-sellable units if the insurer funded the claim on them. Net ≈ $650-900, paid in 2-6 weeks with a survey report. The $72 premium just paid 10:1.
- Carrier route: damaged cartons ≈ 40 kg net affected ≈ $800 theoretical cap, but "per package" negotiation often yields $200-500, in 3-9 months, only with the notice trail perfect.
- Supplier route (packing fault): PI defect clause: documented replacement of the 160 units on the next order, or credit at unit cost plus share of freight proportional to loss. Nothing in the liability caps applies; credibility of your specimen pack decides.
LCL nuance: consolidated shipments add a custody-segment problem — you must show damage entered the consolidated CFS in bad condition, which is why LCL buyers photo-document at the CFS handover (the forwarder's receipt condition is the pivot). And the FCL-vs-LCL math already warned: high-damage-sensitivity categories bias FCL precisely because of this claims mess.
The Supplier-Side Conversation: Claim Without Killing the Relationship
Most post-arrival damage on well-run Chinese orders is small-batch and supplier-fixable. The productive sequence:
- Open with the evidence, not the feeling: photo pack + quantified table + which packing-spec line was not honored. Factories respond to specimen-grade evidence the way buyers do.
- Ask for the fix in the form you want: replacement units on the next PO at cost, or a credit note against the current invoice — replacement is usually better for you and cheaper for them (they avoid refund-channel fees).
- Patch the process, not just the order: a claim is the moment the carton spec gets enforced: updated ECT grade, added dunnage, corner protectors going forward, confirmed with a carton corner drop-test at the next PPS stage.
- Do NOT surprise-deduct from balance: present, agree in writing per the PI clause, then apply the credit. Deduction ambushes convert a $900 fix into a standoff that costs the relationship.
- Log it into the scorecard: the event belongs in the paperwork/quality lines of the panel scorecard — one batch event is noise; two in four quarters is the hard-flag conversation.
Keep the claim language commercial, not legal-threat theatrics. The Chinese supplier ecosystem remembers buyers who escalate proportionally; you will source again.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who pays for damage — supplier, forwarder, carrier or insurer?
Liability follows the Incoterm risk line first: under FOB, transit loss runs to your cargo insurance and the carrier's limited package liability, while supplier-side packing faults stay claimable under the PI defect clause. The insurance route is the fastest payer at invoice value; the carrier route is a small slow supplement; the supplier route pays fully when packing nonconformity is documented. Incoterms decide whose risk it was, and the fault pattern decides whose pocket it is.
How long do I have to file a damage claim?
Stacked deadlines: quantify and photograph within 5 working days; ocean carrier written notice at delivery (one-year Hague-Visby suit deadline behind it); most forwarders within 14 days; cargo insurers commonly 30 days and up to 45; the PI defect clause typically 14-30 days. The tightest clock governs your working week — run everything in week one.
Is marine cargo insurance worth it for a $10,000 shipment?
At 0.3-0.6% of invoice it is the cheapest crisis insurance in the chain — $30-60 covers the invoice value of unsellable goods, which is the exposure that actually hurts. The exceptions: buyers whose landed margin is broad enough to self-insure could consider higher deductibles rather than no policy; LCL buyers at very low shipment values sometimes skip it, consciously, at consolidation-risk exposure.
The cartons looked fine but products inside are broken — what then?
Clean outer cartons with broken contents usually means compression damage inside the carton (over-stacked goods, missing void fill for a column of air travel) or pre-stuffing damage. Photograph the crush pattern inside, and check the carton board grade against spec — a 32-ECT double-wall ordered but single-wall supplied is a packing-spec nonconformity claim against the supplier. The damage pattern picks the defendant.
Will the carrier just pay the full claim?
No. Carrier package liability caps (about $20/2-SDR per kg) and custody-segment proof requirements make carrier recovery a small slow supplement — often $200-500 where the invoice loss was thousands. The full-value payer for transit risk is your cargo insurance; the full-value payer for packing faults is the supplier. Preserve the carrier notice anyway — its one-year suit clock must stay open as leverage.
Should I deduct the loss from the supplier balance?
Only after presenting the evidence and agreeing the credit per the PI defect clause — surprise balance deductions convert a small fix into a standoff and blur who owes what for phase-after-phase of the ledger you share. Order of operations for any claim: evidence pack → quantified notice to each responsible channel → mitigation and salvage → settlement document → then, if supplier-faulted, credit or replacement per the agreed contract language.
Looking at a crushed container right now?
Send us the photo pack and the paperwork set. We'll map the liability by your Incoterm, flag which notice deadline is burning first, and draft the claim letters — free, within 48h.
Request Claim Triage →📍 Make this the next step, not the last